mercoledì 28 maggio 2014

Plato’s Statesman and the Revolutionary Theories of Jack Sarfatti







The theories of Jack Sarfatti are probably the most advanced and revolutionary theories of the modern Physics.

A long series of synchronicity bring me to this theories, some month ago, while I was preparing the material for the novel “108”, (will I ever find someone who will publish it in Italy?) that I’m starting to write in these days. The Idea that I’ll propose in this novel is that Time is not as linear as we could perceive in our ordinary state of consciusness. And I discover it is not just my idea. But it is also the Idea of many mistics and esoterists and also the Idea of More advanced theoric physics like Jack Sarfatti.
So when I red Sarfatti’s Destiny Matrix and his idea that the present come from the future, I immediately thought to Plato and one of his Myth . Not his most famous one “The Cave” from the Repubblic, but a less famous one. The Myth of Cronos inside his book “the Statesman”. A myth that will be less famous but perhaps also more interisting and revolutionary.

But before to speak about this Myth we have to spend some words on Plato.

Everyone Knows that Plato was a great Philosopher. And many think it was a great Mistic.
But just a few know that he has been studying for many years (13) in Egypt, and that he was initiated in Heliopolis by Heliopolis priests. The same egytian priest that, many believe to be the hereditary of an ancient Tradition that comes from an old humanity, previous than the actual one (Atlantis ). Priests who teach Plato that HumanBeings live in a sleeping state and see eveything at reverse. Example of this is the fact we see the sun and the stars moving in the sky, while is earth moving. Priests who were conscious of the Eliocentrism but take this secret inside the bounderies of the temple, not because of classism as we could think, but this will perhaps the subject of another post…

Do we see world at reverse? According Plato Cronos’ Myth yes. This cycle go reverse. Once upon a time when Cronos empired the world, before Zeus, the sun and stars arose in the west and set in the east, and men were earthborn, and reabsorbed in mother’s worb.

But now is time to leave space to Plato’s words:

STRANGER: There did really happen, and will again happen, like many other events of which ancient tradition has preserved the record, the portent which is traditionally said to have occurred in the quarrel of Atreus and Thyestes. You have heard, no doubt, and remember what they say happened at that time?
YOUNG SOCRATES: I suppose you to mean the token of the birth of the golden lamb.
STRANGER: No, not that; but another part of the story, which tells how the sun and the stars once rose in the west, and set in the east, and that the god reversed their motion, and gave them that which they now have as a testimony to the right of Atreus.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes; there is that legend also.
STRANGER: Again, we have been often told of the reign of Cronos.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes, very often.
STRANGER: Did you ever hear that the men of former times were earth-born, and not begotten of one another?
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes, that is another old tradition.
STRANGER: All these stories, and ten thousand others which are still more wonderful, have a common origin; many of them have been lost in the lapse of ages, or are repeated only in a disconnected form; but the origin of them is what no one has told, and may as well be told now; for the tale is suited to throw light on the nature of the king.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very good; and I hope that you will give the whole story, and leave out nothing.
STRANGER: Listen, then. There is a time when God himself guides and helps to roll the world in its course; and there is a time, on the completion of a certain cycle, when he lets go, and the world being a living creature, and having originally received intelligence from its author and creator, turns about and by an inherent necessity revolves in the opposite direction.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Why is that?
STRANGER: Why, because only the most divine things of all remain ever unchanged and the same, and body is not included in this class. Heaven and the universe, as we have termed them, although they have been endowed by the Creator with many glories, partake of a bodily nature, and therefore cannot be entirely free from perturbation. But their motion is, as far as possible, single and in the same place, and of the same kind; and is therefore only subject to a reversal, which is the least alteration possible. For the lord of all moving things is alone able to move of himself; and to think that he moves them at one time in one direction and at another time in another is blasphemy. Hence we must not say that the world is either self-moved always, or all made to go round by God in two opposite courses; or that two Gods, having opposite purposes, make it move round. But as I have already said (and this is the only remaining alternative) the world is guided at one time by an external power which is divine and receives fresh life and immortality from the renewing hand of the Creator, and again, when let go, moves spontaneously, being set free at such a time as to have, during infinite cycles of years, a reverse movement: this is due to its perfect balance, to its vast size, and to the fact that it turns on the smallest pivot.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Your account of the world seems to be very reasonable indeed.
STRANGER: Let us now reflect and try to gather from what has been said the nature of the phenomenon which we affirmed to be the cause of all these wonders. It is this.
YOUNG SOCRATES: What?
STRANGER: The reversal which takes place from time to time of the motion of the universe.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How is that the cause?
STRANGER: Of all changes of the heavenly motions, we may consider this to be the greatest and most complete.
YOUNG SOCRATES: I should imagine so.
STRANGER: And it may be supposed to result in the greatest changes to the human beings who are the inhabitants of the world at the time.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Such changes would naturally occur.
STRANGER: And animals, as we know, survive with difficulty great and serious changes of many different kinds when they come upon them at once.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very true.
STRANGER: Hence there necessarily occurs a great destruction of them, which extends also to the life of man; few survivors of the race are left, and those who remain become the subjects of several novel and remarkable phenomena, and of one in particular, which takes place at the time when the transition is made to the cycle opposite to that in which we are now living.
YOUNG SOCRATES: What is it?
STRANGER: The life of all animals first came to a standstill, and the mortal nature ceased to be or look older, and was then reversed and grew young and delicate; the white locks of the aged darkened again, and the cheeks the bearded man became smooth, and recovered their former bloom; the bodies of youths in their prime grew softer and smaller, continually by day and night returning and becoming assimilated to the nature of a newly-born child in mind as well as body; in the succeeding stage they wasted away and wholly disappeared. And the bodies of those who died by violence at that time quickly passed through the like changes, and in a few days were no more seen.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Then how, Stranger, were the animals created in those days; and in what way were they begotten of one another?
STRANGER: It is evident, Socrates, that there was no such thing in the then order of nature as the procreation of animals from one another; the earth-born race, of which we hear in story, was the one which existed in those days—they rose again from the ground; and of this tradition, which is now-a-days often unduly discredited, our ancestors, who were nearest in point of time to the end of the last period and came into being at the beginning of this, are to us the heralds. And mark how consistent the sequel of the tale is; after the return of age to youth, follows the return of the dead, who are lying in the earth, to life; simultaneously with the reversal of the world the wheel of their generation has been turned back, and they are put together and rise and live in the opposite order, unless God has carried any of them away to some other lot. According to this tradition they of necessity sprang from the earth and have the name of earth-born, and so the above legend clings to them.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly that is quite consistent with what has preceded; but tell me, was the life which you said existed in the reign of Cronos in that cycle of the world, or in this? For the change in the course of the stars and the sun must have occurred in both.
STRANGER: I see that you enter into my meaning;—no, that blessed and spontaneous life does not belong to the present cycle of the world, but to the previous one, in which God superintended the whole revolution of the universe; and the several parts the universe were distributed under the rule of certain inferior deities, as is the way in some places still. There were demigods, who were the shepherds of the various species and herds of animals, and each one was in all respects sufficient for those of whom he was the shepherd; neither was there any violence, or devouring of one another, or war or quarrel among them; and I might tell of ten thousand other blessings, which belonged to that dispensation. The reason why the life of man was, as tradition says, spontaneous, is as follows: In those days God himself was their shepherd, and ruled over them, just as man, who is by comparison a divine being, still rules over the lower animals. Under him there were no forms of government or separate possession of women and children; for all men rose again from the earth, having no memory of the past. And although they had nothing of this sort, the earth gave them fruits in abundance, which grew on trees and shrubs unbidden, and were not planted by the hand of man. And they dwelt naked, and mostly in the open air, for the temperature of their seasons was mild; and they had no beds, but lay on soft couches of grass, which grew plentifully out of the earth. Such was the life of man in the days of Cronos, Socrates; the character of our present life, which is said to be under Zeus, you know from your own experience. Can you, and will you, determine which of them you deem the happier?
YOUNG SOCRATES: Impossible.
STRANGER: Then shall I determine for you as well as I can?
YOUNG SOCRATES: By all means.
STRANGER: Suppose that the nurslings of Cronos, having this boundless leisure, and the power of holding intercourse, not only with men, but with the brute creation, had used all these advantages with a view to philosophy, conversing with the brutes as well as with one another, and learning of every nature which was gifted with any special power, and was able to contribute some special experience to the store of wisdom, there would be no difficulty in deciding that they would be a thousand times happier than the men of our own day. Or, again, if they had merely eaten and drunk until they were full, and told stories to one another and to the animals—such stories as are now attributed to them—in this case also, as I should imagine, the answer would be easy. But until some satisfactory witness can be found of the love of that age for knowledge and discussion, we had better let the matter drop, and give the reason why we have unearthed this tale, and then we shall be able to get on. In the fulness of time, when the change was to take place, and the earth-born race had all perished, and every soul had completed its proper cycle of births and been sown in the earth her appointed number of times, the pilot of the universe let the helm go, and retired to his place of view; and then Fate and innate desire reversed the motion of the world. Then also all the inferior deities who share the rule of the supreme power, being informed of what was happening, let go the parts of the world which were under their control. And the world turning round with a sudden shock, being impelled in an opposite direction from beginning to end, was shaken by a mighty earthquake, which wrought a new destruction of all manner of animals. Afterwards, when sufficient time had elapsed, the tumult and confusion and earthquake ceased, and the universal creature, once more at peace, attained to a calm, and settled down into his own orderly and accustomed course, having the charge and rule of himself and of all the creatures which are contained in him, and executing, as far as he remembered them, the instructions of his Father and Creator, more precisely at first, but afterwords with less exactness. The reason of the falling off was the admixture of matter in him; this was inherent in the primal nature, which was full of disorder, until attaining to the present order. From God, the constructor, the world received all that is good in him, but from a previous state came elements of evil and unrighteousness, which, thence derived, first of all passed into the world, and were then transmitted to the animals. While the world was aided by the pilot in nurturing the animals, the evil was small, and great the good which he produced, but after the separation, when the world was let go, at first all proceeded well enough; but, as time went on, there was more and more forgetting, and the old discord again held sway and burst forth in full glory; and at last small was the good, and great was the admixture of evil, and there was a danger of universal ruin to the world, and to the things contained in him. Wherefore God, the orderer of all, in his tender care, seeing that the world was in great straits, and fearing that all might be dissolved in the storm and disappear in infinite chaos, again seated himself at the helm; and bringing back the elements which had fallen into dissolution and disorder to the motion which had prevailed under his dispensation, he set them in order and restored them, and made the world imperishable and immortal. And this is the whole tale, of which the first part will suffice to illustrate the nature of the king. For when the world turned towards the present cycle of generation, the age of man again stood still, and a change opposite to the previous one was the result. The small creatures which had almost disappeared grew in and stature, and the newly-born children of the earth became grey and died and sank into the earth again. All things changed, imitating and following the condition of the universe, and of necessity agreeing with that in their mode of conception and generation and nurture; for no animal was any longer allowed to come into being in the earth through the agency of other creative beings, but as the world was ordained to be the lord of his own progress, in like manner the parts were ordained to grow and generate and give nourishment, as far as they could, of themselves, impelled by a similar movement. And so we have arrived at the real end of this discourse; for although there might be much to tell of the lower animals, and of the condition out of which they changed and of the causes of the change, about men there is not much, and that little is more to the purpose. Deprived of the care of God, who had possessed and tended them, they were left helpless and defenceless, and were torn in pieces by the beasts, who were naturally fierce and had now grown wild. And in the first ages they were still without skill or resource; the food which once grew spontaneously had failed, and as yet they knew not how to procure it, because they had never felt the pressure of necessity. For all these reasons they were in a great strait; wherefore also the gifts spoken of in the old tradition were imparted to man by the gods, together with so much teaching and education as was indispensable; fire was given to them by Prometheus, the arts by Hephaestus and his fellow-worker, Athene, seeds and plants by others. From these is derived all that has helped to frame human life; since the care of the Gods, as I was saying, had now failed men, and they had to order their course of life for themselves, and were their own masters, just like the universal creature whom they imitate and follow, ever changing, as he changes, and ever living and growing, at one time in one manner, and at another time in another. Enough of the story, which may be of use in showing us how greatly we erred in the delineation of the king and the statesman in our previous discourse.
YOUNG SOCRATES: What was this great error of which you speak?
STRANGER: There were two; the first a lesser one, the other was an error on a much larger and grander scale.
YOUNG SOCRATES: What do you mean?
STRANGER: I mean to say that when we were asked about a king and statesman of the present cycle and generation, we told of a shepherd of a human flock who belonged to the other cycle, and of one who was a god when he ought to have been a man; and this a great error. Again, we declared him to be the ruler of the entire State, without explaining how: this was not the whole truth, nor very intelligible; but still it was true, and therefore the second error was not so great as the first.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very good.



Then according to Plato Cronos’ Myth, the Present comes form the Future as in Sarfatti’s Theories.
But this myth, as others Plato Myth, allow us to devolop further consideration that will soon posted on this blog.

venerdì 5 aprile 2013

Bhagavad Gita - Occupati dell’azione senza pensare ai suoi frutti

La Bhagavad Gita è per l’induismo, ciò che i Vangeli sono per la tradizione Giudaico-cristiana. Rappresenta infatti la sintesi estrema, ed essenziale dell’insegnamento Vedico. Contenuta all’interno del poema epico Mahabharata, narra di Arjuna, e dei suoi dubbi nell’intraprendere la lotta, di combattere una battaglia che lo vedrà contrapposto ai suoi cari ( e qui sarebbe molto interessante comprendere di cosa si sta parlando, chi sono questi “cari”- I difetti personali ai quali siamo legati che non ci permettono di evolvere?- e qual è in realtà la battaglia che si sta combattendo e dove, ma magari di questo parleremo in un altro post). Mentre Arjuna è preso da dubbi arriva in suo soccorso Sri Krishna , il signore supremo che gli spiega il motivo per cui deve battersi. Benché questo poema sintetizzi perfettamente, in maniera essenziale ed efficace la Via Vedica, il centro del suo insegnamento è ulteriormente sintetizzato nei capitoli 14 – 18. Dove Sri Khrisna spiega la natura dell’universo e da una visione della realtà molto simile a quella riscontrabile nella fisica quantistica, con qualche millennio d’anticipo…( bisogna solo avere i mezzi per comprenderne il linguaggio simbolico) Ma se volessimo essere ancora più essenziale, racchiudere il messaggio della Bhagavad Gita in un'unica frase? Per i Vangeli diremmo certamente “Ama il prossimo tuo, come te stesso.” Mentre potremmo scrivere che la Summa dell’insegnamento della Bhagavad Gita è “Arjuna dedicati all’azione senza pensare ai frutti”. Ma cosa significa? Agire in maniera disinteressata! In un mondo in cui gli uomini agiscono solo per interesse, non secondo il cuore, ma secondo i benefici ed i guadagni, e non mi riferisco unicamente al piano economico e materiale ma anche a quello affettivo, lavorativo, sociale. Al prestigio. Alla popolarità. Agire senza puntare alla ricompensa è un atto estremamente rivoluzionario. Perché annulla il Karma. Karma in un’ultima analisi significa causa ed effetto. Compio un’azione, ottengo un effetto. Ma se compio un’azione in maniera disinteressata, non avrò alcun effetto! Per di più in un mondo in cui il capitalismo finanziario insegna esattamente l’opposto, ovvero l’appropriazione del frutto senza compiere alcuna azione, agire in maniera disinteressata è il più grande atto rivoluzionario che sia possibile compiere.

sabato 30 marzo 2013

Heli heli lama sabachthani

Vangelo di Matteo 27,46 Verso le tre, Gesù gridò a gran voce: «Elì, Elì, lemà sabactàni?», che significa: «Dio mio, Dio mio, perché mi hai abbandonato?» Vangelo di Marco 15,34 Alle tre Gesù gridò con voce forte: Eloì, Eloì, lama sabactàni?, che significa: Dio mio, Dio mio, perché mi hai abbandonato? Secondo la versione ortodossa dei Vangeli Eli sarebbe un'invocazione al padre che lo avrebbe abbandonato sulla croce. Ma Gesù in realtà usava la parola Abba per riferirsi al Padre... Qualcuno fa notare che se si chiede ad un discendente Maya cosa significa Heli Heli Lama Sabaz Theni lui risponderà:"Adesso mi immergo nell'aurora della tua presenza". Mi sembra la risposta degna di un essere divino che lascia il corpo materiale per entrare in una nuova dimensione!

domenica 4 marzo 2012

Lucio Dalla - Il cantautore della gente




La perdita di un grande poeta è un lutto per una Nazione. Per un popolo, che ha trovato identità attraverso dei versi, grazie ai quali ha potuto condividere emozioni, trovare conforto. Trovare ristoro. Dissetare la propria voglia di bellezza, e dunque di verità. Perché nell'autenticità dei bei versi, vi è sempre il riflesso della Verità.
La perdita di un vero artista è un lutto per il mondo intero. Perché il mondo perde un po' di bellezza.
Ho visto Dalla una volta. A Catania, durante la Messa dell'Aurora. Era sull'altare della cattedrale, ed osservava il busto di Sant'Agata mentre veniva sceso dal suo altarino per ritornare tra la folla.
Non ho mai conosciuto Dalla, anche se era un carissimo amico di una persona a cui sono amico.
Ma pur non avendolo conosciuto, sento, che se n'è andata una parte di me. Sento che tutti gli italiani hanno perso qualcosa.
Una delle parti migliori di loro. Questo organismo chiamato popolo italiano ha perso una delle sue parti migliori.
Secondo le tradizioni sapienziali, i nomi sono molto importanti. Sono come un programma che determina l'esistenza di un individuo e le sue funzioni nel mondo. Questo è particolarmente vero nel caso di Lucio Dalla. Lucio ha DATO davvero molta Luce al mondo attraverso le sue canzoni.
E questi miei versi, già musicati, composti il 4 Marzo giorno del suo funerale sono il mio piccolo contributo per ricordare un uomo che amava definirsi così: sono siciliano, mezzo africano, un po' norvegese, un po' americano, un po' finlandese ma soprattutto Catanese. Che i Frati di San Francesco di Assisi hanno definito come il Cantautore di Dio.
Bologna, Catania, le Tremiti, Sorrento... l'Italia intera ha perso un abitante speciale.

A Lucio

Cantavi com’è profondo il mare,
Anna e Marco, e Nuvolari,
Caruso che attraversava il mare, il mare.
Da piccolo ti vidi una volta in cattedrale,
osservavi la Santa che scendeva dall’altare.

Andarsene nel mese più amato,
quello più equilibrato,
in cui la luce coincide col buio.
La fine è il mio inizio,
perché l’inizio coincide con la fine,
perché la fine è l’inizio del
secondo tempo

dibudubi dabududa
dipidipidi dapudabudà
dabudabudà dabudabudà

Un lungo viaggio da Bologna a Montreaux
Tra il Jazz ed il Pop.
Vivere e cantare la vita,
cantare la gente, nella gente,
per la gente, fino a potere
ritornare alle stelle.
Nascere e morire,
andarsene e venire, nel mese più bello
quello più amato, più equilibrato.
In cui la luce coincide col buio.
La fine è il mio inizio,
perché l’inizio coincide con la fine,
perché la fine è soltanto l’inizio del
secondo tempo.

dibudubi dabududa
dipidipidi dapudabudà
dabudabuda dabudabudà

Nella vita e nel trascorrere delle stagioni
si nasconde il mistero del Suo nome.
Vivere la vita e il trascorrere delle stagioni per scoprire
il segreto del Suo nome. Il Tetragramma.


dibudubi dabududa
dipidipidi dapudabudà
dabudabuda dabudabudà










Tutti i diritti riservati ad Andrea Di Stefano autore unico del testo.

sabato 15 ottobre 2011

Indigniti contro la Metafisica Finanziaria


A partire dagli anni ottanta, quando Margaret Thatcher aprì in Inghilterra la stagione del neoliberismo, ci viene ripetuto continuamente, con ossessiva costanza che c’è bisogno di mercato, del mercato, di più mercato. Il mercato deve essere libero, libero di privatizzare i ricavi dividendoli agli azionisti, e di nazionalizzare le perdite facendole ricadere sulla collettività.
Il mercato deve essere libero di pagare i manager decine di milioni di euro nonostante le aziende siano in perdita, nonostante licenzino migliaia di dipendenti. Il mercato deve essere libero, libero di permettere alle banche di produrre derivati spazzatura, e di proporli liberamente e consapevolmente ai propri correntisti.
Il termine mercato e le sue varie derivazioni sono diventate un mantra, un incantesimo potentissimo, un rimedio onnipotente, che i politici di tutti gli schieramenti hanno proposto come la panacea di tutti i mali. I risultati di trent’anni di questa mirabiliante cura, sono sotto gli occhi di tutti. Gli stati rischiano il fallimento, mentre lo stato sociale è già fallito.
Ma i banchieri europei, e la finanzia internazionale continuano a proporre la loro cura. Meno stato, più mercato. Usare i fondi per salvare le banche a costo di tagliare la specie sociale, la sanità, l’istruzione il walfare.
Ma a quale fine?
Permettere all’uno per cento della popolazione di avere barche sempre più lunghe, case sempre più grandi, disponibilità economiche sempre più esasperate, mentre la restante parte della popolazione deve vivere di stenti e miseria? Senza prospettive? Senza possibilità di miglioramento?
Può una società permettersi di ribaltare il ruolo del mezzo con quello del fine? Perché è questo che sta facendo il capitalismo finanziario, sacrificando il benessere collettivo in nome del sacro mezzo della finanza.
Ma la finanza dovrebbe servire la popolazione; non dovrebbe essere la popolazione a servire la finanza. Ma viceversa. Perché se la finanza non è utile a migliorare il benessere collettivo, allora è bene che fallisca!
E fallisca al più presto.
Poiché in fondo il capitalismo finanziario non ha fatto altro che impoverire l’economia reale, il lavoro, le aziende, la politica, in nome di una minuscola elite, che come un cancro, si è arricchita sulla distruzione e la rovina di realtà produttive e laboriose costrette a cedere il passo alla speculazione.
Questo ribaltone sociale, questa trasformazione del mezzo in fine è vergognosa ed insostenibile.
La metafisica finanziaria, e le sue menzogne sono oramai divenute insostenibili.
Il capitalismo finanziario ha portato l'occidente al fallimento ed il mondo alla catastrofe ecologica!
Per questo sono vicino a chi si indigna.
L’essere umano prima di tutto.
E a chi chiede quali siano le proposte concrete del movimento, invito gli amici indignati a rispondere alla maniera di Protagora: “L’uomo torni ad essere la misura delle cose”. Che siano i capitali ad essere sacrificati per il benessere degli esseri umani, e non viceversa!

martedì 2 agosto 2011

C'è la crisi. Ma ci sono le barche!


Sin da piccolo, trascorro le mie vacanze nella Valle d’Agrò. Negli stessi paesi e nello stesso mare in cui il poeta Quasimodo, passava le sue vacanze estive nella casa dei nonni.
Un tempo le spiagge erano piene di famiglie. Era la fine degli anni ottanta, erano i primi anni novanta. Erano gli anni del boom delle seconde case. E i cortili dei complessi residenziali estivi si riempivano di orde di bambini gioiosi, che giocavano in gruppo. Palle, nascondini, biciclette, gavettoni.
Oggi le spiagge sono vuote, i cortili non ospitano le ludiche evoluzioni di bambini vivaci, e le autostrade sono vuote, perché le famiglie italiane hanno difficoltà a trovare i soldi per pagare la benzina per andare al mare.
C’è la crisi!
Eppure ho visto passare più barche in questi giorni, che in tutti gli anni precedenti messi insieme.
Un tempo vedere uno yacht passare all’orizzonte era un evento. Adesso se ne vedono di continuo. Ed alcuni sono davvero imbarazzanti. Sono tanto grandi da fare invidia a quelle barche che si noleggiano alla modica cifra di 400mila euro alla settimana, già oggetto qualche anno fa dei celebri manifesti realizzati dal partito della Rifondazione Comunista che avevano per titolo: Anche i Ricchi Piangano.
Immagino che molte di queste barchette, il cui costo di un giorno di navigazione corrisponde allo stipendio di dieci anni di un operaio, appartengano a quei Manager, super pagati non per portare risultati, ma per chiedere i contributi statali per mettere in cassa integrazione i dipendenti… Ma questo è un altro discorso…
Poiché nulla si crea e nulla si distrugge, tutto si trasforma. Il denaro non si è perso, si è semplicemente trasformato, spostato, delocalizzato. La ricchezza si è spostata. E questa crisi è frutto di una cattiva distribuzione della ricchezza che si è mossa dalle tasche di molti a quelle di pochi.
Non sono un bolscevico. Ma credo che il fine di una società non possa essere il lusso sfrenato per pochissimi, in luogo dei sacrifici e delle rinunce di molti.
Una società, degna di questo nome, dovrebbe essere costituita da un insieme di individui che collaborano tra di loro, con spirito cooperativo, traendone reciproco giovamento. Ma se i vantaggi devono essere ristretti ad una piccola cerchia a discapito di una intera collettività… Allora la società non ha ragione di essere. E rischia di crollare, di non reggere!
Non bisogna essere dei grandi sociologi per capirlo.



mercoledì 29 giugno 2011